* Nursing

Includes: Case-control checklist (including harm); Cohort, Decision rule, diagnosis, Economic; Educational intervention; Guideline; Prognosis, Qualitative, RCT; Review or meta-analysis; Screening; Survey (including pre-test probabilities).

Checklists to help you more easily and accurately perform critical appraisal across a number of different study types. Includes: RCT, systematic review, qualitative studies, cohort study, diagnostic study, case control, economic evaluation, and clinical prediction rule.

Includes: meta-analysis or systematic review; controlled study; cohort or panel study; case control study; qualitative study; and case study.

Includes: analytical cross-sectional studies, case control studies, case reports, case series, cohort studies, diagnostic test accuracy studies, economic evaluations, prevalence studies, qualitative research, quasi-experimental studies, RCTs, systematic reviews, expert opinion.

After we have searched for the evidence, We need to decide if it is both valid and important before deciding if we can apply the evidence to our individual patients. The order in which we consider validity and importance depends on individual preference. Includes: Diagnosis, Harm, Prognosis, systematic review (of therapy), and Therapy worksheets.

NHLBI developed a set of tailored quality assessment tools to assist reviewers in focusing on concepts that are key to a study’s internal validity. The tools were specific to certain study designs and tested for potential flaws in study methods or implementation. Includes: Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies, Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, Quality Assessment of Case-Control Studies, Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies With No Control Group, and Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies.

The PRISMA 2020 statement comprises a 27-item checklist addressing the introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of a systematic review report. Includes extensions for the following: PRISMA for Abstracts; PRISMA for Acupuncture; PRISMA for Diagnostic Test Accuracy; PRISMA for EcoEvo; PRISMA Equity; PRISMA Harms (for reviews including Harm outcomes); PRISMA Individual Patient Data; PRISMA for Network Meta-Analyses; PRISMA for Protocols; PRISMA for Scoping Reviews; PRISMA for Searching; & Other Extensions in development.

Rapid evidence-based answers to real-life clinical questions, using a systematic approach to reviewing the literature.

BMJ Best Practice is a user-friendly EBM tool. Ideal at the point of care and in the academic setting. Step-by-step guidance is provided for symptom evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, follow up and prevention. Updated daily using robust evidence based methodology and expert opinion.

Checklists to help you more easily and accurately perform critical appraisal across a number of different study types. Includes: RCT, systematic review, qualitiatiative studies, cohort study, diagnostic study, case control, economic evaluation, and clinical prediction rule.

Includes: meta-analysis or systematic review; controlled study; cohort or panel study; case control study; qualitative study; and case study.

Includes: analytical cross-sectional studies, case control studies, case reports, case series, cohort studies. diagnostic test accuracy studies, economic evaluations, prevalence studies, qualitative research, quasi-experimental studies, RCTs, systematic reviews, expert opinion.

After we have searched for the evidence, we need to decide if it is both valid and important before deciding if we can apply the evidence to our individual patients. The order in which we consider validity and importance depends on individual preference. Include: Diagnosis, Harm, Prognosis, systematic review (of therapy), and Therapy worksheets.

NHLBI developed a set of tailored quality assessment tools to assist reviewers in focusing on concepts that are key to a study’s internal validity. The tools were specific to certain study designs and tested for potential flaws in study methods or implementation. Includes: Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies, Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, Quality Assessment of Case-Control Studies, Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies With No Control Group, and Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies.

PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PRISMA primarily focuses on the reporting of reviews evaluating the effects of interventions, but can also be used as a basis for reporting systematic reviews with objectives other than evaluating interventions (e.g. evaluating aetiology, prevalence, diagnosis or prognosis).